CeFi lending · Japan

BitTrade 貸暗号資産

Active centralized crypto-asset lending service operated by BitTrade. First-party terms describe an unsecured consumption-loan exposure outside statutory segregated management, with offering-specific lending periods and contractual lending fees.

Also known as: BitTrade Lending, ビットトレード 貸暗号資産, 貸して増やす

Status
Active
Outcome
Not applicable
Confidence
High
Last verified
2026-08-17
Launch
End
Failure reasonUnknown
Events0
Evidence3
Products1

Case summary

What happened

BitTrade currently operates a crypto-asset lending service. First-party materials state that after application the lent crypto is locked, individual contracts are in principle not cancellable mid-term, and the lent crypto plus contractual lending fee is returned within the published return window after the lending period. BitTrade explicitly states that the service is not crypto-asset exchange business under the Payment Services Act, that lent assets are not subject to statutory segregated management, and that customers have no priority repayment right over other creditors. The agreement is described as an unsecured consumption-loan contract, and BitTrade warns that lent crypto may not be returned if BitTrade fails. Historical first-party campaign records establish prior operation but do not establish the exact original launch day, so CYA does not infer one.

Customer result

Customer outcome

Not applicable

Current product mechanics do not prove universal historical repayment performance or a realized recovery percentage.

Estimated recovery
Not applicable
Repayment started
Repayment completed
Confidence
High

Asset treatment

Terms risk

Platform-owned

Individual contracts are in principle not cancellable mid-term. BitTrade warns that lent crypto may not be returned if it fails. Published rates remain issuer product terms, not verified realized returns.

Affected product
BitTrade 貸暗号資産
Confidence
High

The reviewed materials describe customers lending crypto assets to BitTrade under an unsecured consumption-loan contract. BitTrade expressly states that lent assets are not subject to statutory segregated management and that customers have no priority repayment right over other creditors. CYA therefore represents borrower/counterparty economic exposure during the lending period and does not infer exchange-custody protection, deposit protection, insurance or guaranteed principal.

Source: 貸暗号資産

Known unknowns

Uncertainty

Exact original launch date is not established by the reviewed first-party evidence. Published lending rates are issuer product terms, not independently verified realized returns. Current return mechanics do not establish universal historical repayment performance.

Chronology

Historical record

No events yet.

Source record

Evidence dossier

Filter by claim, reliability, source type, and whether evidence is linked to a specific event.

Showing 3 of 3 evidence records

status

1 sources
Official statementHigh

キャンペーン情報

BitTrade

First-party campaign archive supports historical operation in earlier periods. It is not used to fabricate an exact original launch date or to treat advertised rates as realized return.

terms risk

2 sources
Official statementHigh

貸暗号資産

BitTrade

Current first-party authority for the lending service, lock/return mechanics, mid-term cancellation boundary, non-segregated custody, unsecured consumption-loan exposure, creditor-priority boundary and possible non-return on BitTrade failure.

Official statementHigh

貸暗号資産サービスとは

BitTrade

First-party explanatory material for the lending product. Published rate examples remain issuer product terms rather than independently verified realized returns.

Comparative records

Independent archive

Help maintain customer-outcome records

Support court-document review, source preservation, corrections, broken-link replacement, and long-term archive maintenance. Support does not influence classifications or evidence standards.

Support CYA

Record maintenance

Report this record

Report incorrect dates, status, customer outcome, terms-risk interpretation, URL history, or missing evidence.

Submit correction →