Registry analysis
Stats
A measured view of registry scale, failure and recovery timelines, evidence coverage, and classification quality. Counts are generated directly from the current canonical JSON.
Coverage summary
What is documented
Coverage metrics distinguish registry size from evidence completeness and known metadata.
| Metric | Value | Count | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Archive coverage | 87% | 129 / 149 | Platforms with an archived URL recorded. |
| Known origin | 100% | 149 / 149 | Platforms with country or origin context. |
| High confidence | 83% | 123 / 149 | Entity records currently marked high confidence. |
| Evidence coverage | 100% | 149 / 149 | Platforms with at least one reviewed evidence record. |
| High-reliability evidence | 99% | 147 / 149 | Platforms with at least one evidence record marked high reliability. |
| Outcome coverage | 100% | 149 / 149 | Platforms with a customer-outcome record. |
| Recovery type coverage | 0% | 0 / 149 | Outcome records with a recovery type explicitly recorded. |
| First repayment date coverage | 0% | 0 / 149 | Outcome records with a first repayment or distribution date recorded. |
| Terms coverage | 100% | 149 / 149 | Platforms with a terms-risk record. |
Core analysis
Registry composition
Bars show each category as a share of its relevant record set. Exact counts remain visible.
Platform status
Current registry state assigned to each platform.
Platform type
Service category used by the current entity model.
Failure reason
Primary historical driver, including unknown values.
Customer outcome
Outcome records across repayment, claims, and active comparator cases.
Recovery type
Recorded form of customer recovery or distribution; unknown remains explicit.
Terms risk
How deposited assets and contractual treatment are currently classified.
Evidence reliability
Source-strength labels assigned to evidence records.
Event type
Recorded historical event categories.
Source type
Distribution of official, regulatory, court, archive, and reporting sources.
Lifecycle and recovery
Failure and repayment timelines
Timeline counts use reviewed canonical dates only. Missing dates are excluded rather than inferred.
Platform end year
Canonical platform end dates by year. Platforms without an end date are excluded.
First repayment year
First recorded customer repayment or distribution dates by year. Outcomes without a recorded first repayment date are excluded.
Evidence depth per platform
Reviewed evidence count bands by platform. This measures source depth, not factual certainty by itself.
Confidence distribution
Entity certainty
Confidence reflects the registry record, not investment quality or platform safety.
| Confidence | Count | Share |
|---|---|---|
| High | 123 | 83% |
| Medium | 26 | 17% |