Registry analysis

Stats

A measured view of registry scale, composition, evidence coverage, and classification quality. Counts are generated directly from the current canonical JSON.

Last verified
2026-06-18
Unit
Platform entity
Source
Canonical JSON
Mode
Static snapshot
Platforms32canonical entities
Events158historical records
Evidence214source records
Outcomes32customer outcomes
Products50product profiles
Terms risk32terms records
Archive coverage100%32 / 32
High confidence56%18 / 32

Coverage summary

What is documented

Coverage metrics distinguish registry size from evidence completeness and known metadata.

MetricValueCountInterpretation
Archive coverage100%32 / 32Platforms with an archived URL recorded.
Known origin100%32 / 32Platforms with country or origin context.
High confidence56%18 / 32Entity records currently marked high confidence.
Outcome coverage100%32 / 32Platforms with a customer-outcome record.
Terms coverage100%32 / 32Platforms with a terms-risk record.

Core analysis

Registry composition

Bars show each category as a share of its relevant record set. Exact counts remain visible.

Platform status

Current registry state assigned to each platform.

Operations ended17
53%
Active5
16%
Restructuring4
13%
Limited3
9%
Bankrupt2
6%
Withdrawals suspended1
3%

Platform type

Service category used by the current entity model.

Crypto interest account9
28%
Centralized yield platform7
22%
exchange earn6
19%
Borrow/lend platform5
16%
CeFi lending2
6%
Institutional lending2
6%
defi lending1
3%

Failure reason

Primary historical driver, including unknown values.

Counterparty exposure8
25%
Regulatory action5
16%
Misconduct4
13%
Unknown4
13%
Insolvency3
9%
Liquidity crisis3
9%
market collapse3
9%
risk mismanagement1
3%
Voluntary shutdown1
3%

Customer outcome

Outcome records across repayment, claims, and active comparator cases.

Claims ongoing13
41%
Not applicable7
22%
Partial repayment6
19%
Full repayment3
9%
Unknown2
6%
No recovery1
3%

Terms risk

How deposited assets and contractual treatment are currently classified.

Varies by product17
53%
Unknown7
22%
Platform-owned5
16%
Unclear3
9%

Evidence reliability

Source-strength labels assigned to evidence records.

High145
68%
Medium69
32%

Event type

Recorded historical event categories.

Launch22
14%
Other21
13%
Regulatory action21
13%
Operations ended16
10%
Withdrawals suspended16
10%
yield program started15
9%
Restructuring started14
9%
customer repayment started9
6%
Bankruptcy filing7
4%
lawsuit6
4%
Restructuring completed4
3%
asset sale announced3
2%
deposits suspended3
2%
customer repayment completed1
1%

Source type

Distribution of official, regulatory, court, archive, and reporting sources.

News article66
31%
Regulatory notice55
26%
Official statement44
21%
Court document19
9%
archive capture18
8%
bankruptcy document8
4%
database reference3
1%
Other1
0%

Confidence distribution

Entity certainty

Confidence reflects the registry record, not investment quality or platform safety.

ConfidenceCountShare
High1856%
Medium1444%